终身监禁型死刑执行方式的理解与适用  

Rational Interpretation of Life Imprisonment Type Death Sentence with Reprieve

作　　者：张武举[1] 苟静[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院

出　　处：《社会科学》2017年第2期100-108,共9页Journal of Social Sciences

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金项目"伦理的刑事司法运用研究"(项目编号:15XZX016)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：作为死刑的执行方式之一,"终身监禁"诞生于贪污贿赂犯罪立法,其诞生具有一定的刑事政策导向因素。在价值上,终身监禁是对死刑威慑的弥补和扩充,其功利价值和伦理价值不容否认。司法适用中,需结合"罪行极其严重"和"根据犯罪情节等情况"两个要素,判定是否能有效消除行为的"社会危害性"及行为人的"个体人身危险性"和"社会危险性"。惟此,方能体现罪刑均衡精神、实现这一死刑执行方式的特殊预防效果。在终身监禁的溯及力问题上,应当立足于终身监禁的本来性质进行考察。在执行过程中,需要考虑死缓考验期间有无故意犯罪或重大立功表现、减刑后发现漏罪以及终身监禁期间有重大立功表现等情况分别处理。As an execution mode of death penalty, life imprisonment was born in embezzlement crime and bribery crime,which has specific criminal policy factors. It can remedy and expand the death penalty deter in value, so the utility value and the ethic value of which can＇ t be denied. In applicable conditions, we need to consider whether the criminal elements commit the most heinous crimes and the circumstances of the crime and other circumstances to determine whether we can eliminate the criminal social harm and offenders＇ individual danger, social danger, we have to consider the balance between crime and punishment and the effect of special prevention. As for the retroactivity of life imprison- ment, we should analysis based on its nature. In the implementation process, we need to consider whether the offender took an intentional crime or major meritorious service.

关 键 词：终身监禁 死刑执行方式 价值 适用 执行 

分 类 号：D924.12[政治法律—刑法学]