组合评价和复合评价模型在学术期刊评价优越性的实证研究  

An Empirical Study for Combination Evaluation and Composite Evaluation Model in the Academic Journal Evaluation Superiority

作　　者：熊国经[1] 熊玲玲[1] 陈小山[1] 

机构地区：[1]南昌大学经济管理学院,江西南昌330031

出　　处：《现代情报》2017年第1期81-88,共8页Journal of Modern Information

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"非参数估计的影响因素优化匹配方法与应用研究"(项目编号:14BTJ016);创新专项资金项目"基于PLS结构方程模型的学术期刊评价实证研究"(项目编号:CX2016132)

摘　　要：[目的 /意义]由于传统的单一评价方法弊端愈加明显,笔者将通过实证研究证明组合评价及复合评价模型在学术期刊评价中相对于单一评价模型的优越性,为学术期刊评价提供更合理的评价视角。[方法 /过程]单一评价方法是选择运用熵值法、因子分析法和TOPSIS法对学术期刊进行学术影响力评价,提出的组合评价模型原理是通过对这3种单一评价方法的结果进行Kendall检验,在具有显著性一致性的基础上建立模糊Borda组合评价模型进行组合评价,提出的复合评价模型的原理是通过熵值法的差异系数对因子分析的主因子方差贡献率和因子得分系数的修正,确定各指标的权重、构造加权规范矩阵,运用TOPSIS法进行综合评价。[结果 /结论]实证研究表明,组合评价模型和复合评价模型与单一评价模型评价结果一致性较好,且组合评价模型和复合评价模型具有更好的区分度,相对于单一评价具有一定的优越性。[Purpose /Significance] Because of the drawbacks of traditional single evaluation method becomes more obvious, it would prove through a combination of empirical research and evaluation of complex evaluation model in the academic journal evaluation with respect to the evaluation of the advantages of a single model, provide a more rational assessment perspective academic journal evaluation. [Method / Process] Single evaluation method was to choose to use entropy method, factor analysis and TOPSIS method to influence academic journal for academic evaluation, the combination of the principles of evaluation model proposed by these three single evaluation method Kendall test results in significant consistency on the basis of fuzzy Borda combination evaluation model combined evaluation, the principles of composite evaluation model proposed amendments was the main factor variance contribution rate and factor score coefficient by the coefficient of variation of entropy method of factor analysis to determine the index of weights, weighted normal matrix structure, using TOPSIS comprehensive evaluation method. [Result / Conclusion] Empirical studies had shown that a combination of complex evaluation model and evaluation model and a single evaluation model results were in good agreement, and the combination of complex evaluation model and evaluation model had better discrimination with respect to the single evaluation has certain advantages.

关 键 词：学术期刊 单一评价模型 模糊Borda法 Kendall 组合评价模型 复合评价模型 

分 类 号：G255.2[文化科学—图书馆学] G644.4