学术评价:量化模式的反思与超越  

Academic Evaluation: Reflect and Overstep the Quantitative Evaluation Mode

作　　者：李冲[1] 苏永建[1] LI Chong SU Yong - jian(Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian 116023, China)

机构地区：[1]大连理工大学人文与社会科学学部,辽宁大连116023

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2017年第2期59-63,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金青年项目"人文社会科学研究多元多方评价的制度结构和运行机制研究"(12CGL003)

摘　　要：在理论层面对量化评价模式进行分析,是发挥其正功能、避免其负作用的根本途径。量化评价不是一个科学理论,而是一种应用社会研究。量化模式适用于学术评价需要满足三个前提条件。自然科学、社会科学和人文学科与之符合的程度不同,量化评价模式难以成为一个普适性的学术评价框架。学术评价实践应当审慎使用量化评价模式,一方面是其理论逻辑具有天然的局限性;另一方面是其同样也无法避免非学术因素的影响。Quantitative evaluation wants to play its positive function and avoid the negative effects, analysis in its theoretical dimension is of a fundamental way. Back to the origins of the quantitative evaluation, it can be found, it is not a scientific theory, but a social research application. The availability of quantization mode in the academic evaluation needs to meet three conditions. Due to the differentia of natural sciences, social sciences and humanities in meeting the three conditions, the quantitative evaluation model is not a universal evaluation framework. Quantitative evaluation model should be used carefully and prudently, because of, on the one hand, the theoretical logic of quantitative evaluation has its natural limitations; on the other hand, the process of quantitative evaluation also cannot avoid the impact of non - academic factors.

关 键 词：学术研究 量化评价 自然科学 社会科学 人文学科 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]