检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:彭岳津[1] 林锦[1] 卞荣伟 闵星[1] 韩江波[1] 柳鹏[1]
机构地区:[1]南京水利科学研究院,江苏南京210029 [2]南京大学地球科学与工程学院,江苏南京210023
出 处:《水利经济》2017年第1期36-39,共4页Journal of Economics of Water Resources
摘 要:在分析排水水资源费的本质、排水与取水水资源费确定方法异同点的基础上,提出理论上排水水资源费征收标准的2种确定方法,即直接利用取水水资源费征收标准进行修正的方法和排水水资源费的边际机会成本法。同时分析目前我国地方省份采矿及建筑施工排水水资源费征收标准的特点,并利用提出的2种排水水资源费征收标准的确定方法分析产生这些特点的原因,论证有些地方省份排水水资源费征收标准高于取水水资源费征收标准的缘由。Based on the analysis of the similarities and differences ofthe methods for determiningthe water resources fee for water drainage andintakeas well as the essence of water resource fee of drainage, two methods for determining the collecting standards of water resource fee for drainage are proposed in theory. Oneis the modified method to directly use the collecting standards of water resource fee for water intake. The other is the marginal opportunity cost method of water resource fee for drainage. At the same time,the characteristics of the current collecting standards for water resource feefor drainage of bothmining and building operation in some provinces of China are analyzed. The proposed methods are employed to analyze the reasons for these characteristics. It is demonstrated that the collecting standards ofwater resource fee for drainage are higher than those for water intake withdraw in some provinces of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28