检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:方世敏[1] 兰钰斌 FANG Shi-min LAN Yu-bin(Tourism Management School, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105)
出 处:《怀化学院学报》2016年第12期46-50,共5页Journal of Huaihua University
摘 要:凤凰古城三年经历两次票制改革,2013年4月10日,凤凰县政府将"景点票"改为"景区票",遭到当地居民和商户强烈反对;2016年4月10日,凤凰县政府将"景区票"改为"景点票",社会舆论沸腾,引起轩然大波。用博弈分析方法对凤凰古城票制改革利益相关者展开分析,结果表明:(1)较于景区管理公司和当地政府,景区居民和商户与游客都是弱势群体;(2)当前的"景点票"制度不具有稳定性;(3)全域旅游背景下,降低景区门票价格的新门票政策与景区未来的发展相适应且具有稳定性。Ancient city of Phoenix has undergone twice-ticket system reform in the past three years,On April 10, 2013, the Phoenix county government changed "scenic spot ticket" to "scenic area ticket", by local residents and businesses strongly opposed.On April 10, 2016, the county government changed scenic area ticket to " scenic spot ticket " ,Different public opinions caused a great disturbance.In this paper, the game analysis method is used to analyze the stakeholders of the reform of the Phoenix Town ticket system.The results showed that: (1) compared with the scenic spot management company and local government, businesses, residents and tourists are vulnerable groups; (2) the "scenic spot ticket" system has no stability; (3) under the background of region-based tourism development, the policy of reducing ticket price will have stability and be a good match for the future development of tourism.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229