百年学讼与“弗莱德加”身份问题  

The Authorship of“Fredegar”and the Century-long Controversy

作　　者：陈文海[1] 

机构地区：[1]华南师范大学历史文化学院,广东广州510631

出　　处：《外国问题研究》2016年第4期25-34,共10页FOREIGN HISTORY STUDIES

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"<弗莱德加编年史>(第四卷及其续编)汉译与研究"(编号:11BSS001);广东省高等学校珠江学者岗位计划资助项目"法兰克时代核心历史文献的汉译与研究"

摘　　要：《弗莱德加编年史》是中世纪早期法兰克国家核心史料之一。与诸多中世纪其他编年史一样,该书的编写者一直处于佚名状态。围绕这一问题,19世纪晚期以来,西方史学界经历一场历时久远的学术争论,并由此形成三大流派。克鲁什等人认为,该书先后经历三人之手方告完成。海尔曼等人则认为,其编写者有两个人。高法特等人却认为,该编年史由一人编写而成。虽然说在这一问题上至今尚无共识,但相关的学术争论却大大促进了人们对该编年史的深层把握,对法兰克历史研究工作亦产生积极的推动作用。Chronicle of Fredegar was one of the key materials appearing in the Frankish Kingdom in the early Middle Ages.Like many other medieval chronicles,it was anonymous.Focusing on the problem of its authorship,a long academic controversy,which began in the late 19 th century,has been in the process,and thus three major schools were formed.Krusch,a German historian,believed that three authors had contributed to the chronicle.Hellmann,another German historian,maintained that the number was two.Goffart,a Canadian historian,insists that a single author was responsible for the chronicle.No consensus to the problem has been achieved by far.However,the academic controversy greatly promoted the deep understanding of the chronicle,and benefited much to the study of the Frankish history.

关 键 词：《弗莱德加编年史》 编写者身份 克鲁什 海尔曼 高法特 

分 类 号：K13-5[历史地理—历史学]