检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《情报理论与实践》2017年第2期51-55,47,共6页Information Studies:Theory & Application
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目"我国个人信息保护立法研究"(项目编号:10YJC820123);国家社会科学基金重点项目"依法治国与党内法规建设研究"(项目编号:14AZD137)的成果
摘 要:文章采用案例分析法、比较分析法、理论分析法对我国的个人信息保护进行定性、定量的分析。研究结果表明,我国的个人信息权利保护,在法律文本层面处于碎片化、零散化状态;在司法实践层面遭遇到"搭车条款""反搭车条款"以及"分歧条款"的现实困境。在个人信息权利保护法律关系下,构建个人信息权利保护自身的法制体系;在行政信息公开法律关系下,拓补个人信息保护的权利体系与救济机制;设立专门的第三方信息咨询评测机构,协调信息公开与信息保护的立法原则与立法精神,搭建个人信息权利保护的协调衔接机制,是实现对个人信息权利全面、严格、系统保护的根本之道。This paper makes both the qualitative and quantitative analyses of individual information protection in China by case analysis, comparative analysis and theoretical analysis. Results show that the protection of individual information fights is fragmen- ted and scattered from legal text and faces the realistic predicaments of "lift terms", "anti-lift terms" and "differences between terms" in judicial practices. It' s very important to first establish its own legal system under the legal relationship of individual infor- mation rights protection, second expand the fight system and remedy mechanism under the legal relationship of administrative infor- mation disclosure, third found specialized third party information consulting evaluation agencies to coordinate the legislative princi- ples and spirit of the government information disclosure and protection, as well as to build the coordination mechanism of individual information rights protection. The above measures are the fundamental ways to realize the comprehensive, strict and systematic pro- tection of the individual information fights.
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] G203[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.158