刑事陪审中法律问题与事实问题的区分  

Distinguishing Legal Question and Question of Fact in Criminal Jury

作　　者：陈学权[1] 

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院

出　　处：《中国法学》2017年第1期53-70,共18页China Legal Science

基　　金：国家2011计划"司法文明协同创新研究中心";中国法学会2015年重点课题"我国刑事陪审中法律问题与事实问题的区分"[项目批准号:CLS(2015)B11]的研究成果

摘　　要：事实问题具有法律性,法律问题具有事实性,因此在理论上很难找到清晰而明确的标准准确地区分刑事陪审中的法律问题与事实问题。境外刑事陪审实践中对法律问题与事实问题之区分,主要是通过程序机制的方法明确法官和陪审员的具体职责,由此形成了一般裁定和问题清单两种不同的模式。我国刑事陪审中法律问题与事实问题的区分,既要遵循法哲学上有关诉讼中区分法律问题与事实问题的基本规律,又要充分考虑我国法律传统和司法实践等因素。Question of fact and it is thus difficult to find a has the legal attribute, legal question has the fact property, clear and definite standard to distinguish legal question and question of fact in criminal jury. The overseas differentiate legal issues and questions of fact mainly through the way of procedure mechanism to clarify the specific responsibilities of justice and jury, therefore two different patterns namely general rule and issues list formed. The distinction between legal question and question of fact in our people＇s jury not only need to follow the basic rules in philosophy of law about how to differentiate legal issues and questions of fact in lawsuit, but also fully consider factors of legal tradition and judicial practice.

关 键 词：人民陪审员制度 法律问题 事实问题 

分 类 号：D926.2[政治法律—法学]