检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨科[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南省人民医院泌尿外科,湖南长沙410000
出 处:《中国卫生标准管理》2017年第2期55-57,共3页China Health Standard Management
摘 要:目的研究高危前列腺增生治疗中经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术的临床疗效。方法按标准选取本院高危前列腺增生患者86例作为研究对象,将其随机分为观察组与对照组,每组各43例。观察组采用经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术(Ho LEP)治疗;对照组采用经尿道前列腺汽化电切术(TUEVP)治疗。对两组患者手术情况及相关疗指标进行观察对比。结果观察组手术出血量少于对照组(P<0.01);观察组患者住院时间、留置尿管时间、膀胱冲洗时间均短于对照组(P<0.01);观察组并发症发生率低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论在高危前列腺增生治疗中,经尿道前列腺钬激光剜除术颇具疗效。Objective To investigate the clinical curative effect of Ho LEP in the treatment of high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods 86 cases of patients with high-risk prostate hyperplasia were selected as the study object and were divided into observation group and control group, 43 cases in each group. Observation group used Ho LEP, the control group used TUEVP treatment, the related therapeutic index were observed. Results The operative blood observation group less than the control group(P〈0.01). Compared with the time in hospitalization, indwelling catheter, bladder irrigation. The observation group was shorter(P〈0.01). Low complication rates observed group than the control group(P〈0.05). Conclusion Ho LEP in the treatment of high-risk benign prostatic hyperplasia has curative effect.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117