转轨时期国家投资经营二元化法制逻辑  

Dualistic Legal Logic of State Investment Management in Transitional Period

作　　者：胡国梁[1] HU Guoliang(School of Law, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330013, China)

机构地区：[1]江西财经大学法学院,江西南昌330013

出　　处：《山东财经大学学报》2017年第1期110-117,共8页Journal of Shandong University of Finance and Economics

摘　　要：在当前经济转轨时期,国家投资经营领域的分类改革已成共识,但在如何具体分类上仍存分歧。调节型投资和营利型投资的分类方式能较好地回应国家经济调节的现实需要和转轨时期特定的经济背景。就理论而言,调节型投资相比营利型投资更具正当性,转轨过程中营利型投资阶段性存在的实践根据在于避免扰乱现有经济秩序、民众观念转变需要一个过程、防止权力失控下国有资产流失等。从法制逻辑来看,应当根据调节型投资和营利型投资的不同情况做出二元化处理。调节型投资应当紧紧围绕经济调节这一核心功能,营利型投资应当逐步缩减经济规模,防止与民争利。In current economy transitional period, the classification reforms in national investment and management field has become a consensus, but divergences exist in specific classification. The classification of regulatory investment and profitable investment can respond well to the practical needs of national economic adjustment and the economic background of transitional period. Theoretically, regulatory investment is more legitimate compared with profitable investment, and the practical basis of the stage existence of profitable investment during the transitional period lies in avoiding disrupting the existing economic order, the need of a process for public view change, and preventing state asset loss when the power is out of control. From the legal logic point of view, regulatory investment and profitable investment should be treated dualistically based on their differences. Regulatory investment should focus on the core function of economic regulation while profitable investment should gradually reduce its economic scale to prevent competing with the public for profits.

关 键 词：转轨时期 国家投资经营 国有企业 

分 类 号：F830.591[经济管理—金融学]