检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱紫岩
出 处:《江苏卫生事业管理》2017年第1期30-33,共4页Jiangsu Health System Management
摘 要:目的:比较不同病案质量控制方法对病案质量的影响,为病案书写质控方法的选择提供科学依据。方法 :随机选取睢宁县人民医院心内科、普外科2014年1月~10月间实施终末病历质控351份和2014年11月-2015年9月间实施联合病历质控的病历资料403份,评价分析包括甲级病历率、病历缺陷率及主要病历缺陷在内的两组病历的质量变化。比较各种病案质量控制方法的效果。结果:实现联合质量控制在甲级病历率有明显提高,病历缺陷率出现了下降趋势,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 :联合质量控制可以更好的保障病案的质量。Objective:Providing the scientific basis for the medical record writing through the different Qc methods comparing. Methods: Choosing the medical records of cardiology department and general surgery department of the People's Hospital of Suining County,the records which were the 351 terminal controled from January to October in 2014 and the 403 joint quality controled from November in 2014 to September in 2015, and compared the two control methods through the analysis about the a grade rates, defect rates and the main defection of the two groups of records above. Results:Through the joint quality control method, the a grade rates were obviously promoted,and the defect rates were declined,so it had the statistical significanc. Conclusion:The joint control method could gurarantee the quality of medical record.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222