“左右博弈”:国民党文艺政策与现代长篇小说的传播接受——以1928—1937年为中心  

Left-right Game: KMT literary Policies and The Reception of Chinese Modern Novels: 1928—1937

作　　者：陈思广[1] 廖海杰 

机构地区：[1]四川大学文学与新闻学院,四川成都610064

出　　处：《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第1期36-44,共9页Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：2012年度教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目(12YJA751003)

摘　　要：在1928—1937年间"左右博弈"的文学生态结构中,现代长篇小说是左右翼文学群体争夺的重点体裁。由于左翼文学群体处于官方的对立面,契合了新文学读者群,应和了新文学的先锋精神和批判权力,而上海新书业的繁荣为实现左翼文学群体内部有效的推介和提携提供了平台,使左翼长篇小说在十年间皆保持着较强的传播效果和较大的影响力。相反,右翼文学群体的官方色彩使其疏离了新文学潜在的读者群,创作的单薄和理论的虚无以及文学群体内部组织的涣散与重理论阐发轻文学评论的倾向,使其无论在长篇小说的创作还是传播接受的博弈中,都完全处于下风。不均衡的博弈结构使长篇小说的接受偏至多于新拓,攻伐多于交流,立场决定观念,"误读"成为常态,既未能实现长篇小说文本意义潜势的多元打开,也在客观上狭隘化了长篇小说的传播接受,令人深感遗憾。In 1928- 1937 years,＂ left- right game＂ as the structure of literature, Chinese modern novels is the focus of the left right literary groups competition. On account of the left - wing literary group in the official literature antithesis, it fits the pioneer spirit and critical powers of the Chinese new literature, and wins the audience. The prosperous Shanghai book industry also provides a platform for effective internal promotion of the left - wing literary group. It allows left - wing novels in the decade to maintain strong communication effects and greater influence. In contrast, the official colors of the right - wing groups alienated potential audience, invalid literary theory, worthless literature creation and lax organization tends to be disadvantageous in the dissemination and reception of right - wing novels. The unbalance structure makes the Chinese modern novels become misreading and attack more than reception and conversation, and ＂ misreading＂ become the norm. It failed to achieve the openning of the novels textual meaning potential, and objectively narrow the Chinese modern novels reception. It is deeply regrettable.

关 键 词：左翼 右翼 博弈 现代长篇小说 传播 接受 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]