王安石《春秋》学思想探究——以《春秋》公案考辨为中心  

On Wang An-shi's Thought of the Studies on the Spring and Autumn Annals

作　　者：侯步云[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西科技大学思政部,陕西西安710021

出　　处：《西北大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第1期147-154,共8页Journal of Northwest University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社科基金(13XZS011);陕西科技大学博士科研启动基金(BJ10-03)

摘　　要："断烂朝报""不列《春秋》于学官"是《春秋》学史上的两大公案。王安石所谓《春秋》"断烂朝报"指《春秋》注解之书,并以《春秋》经发展的特点而确有"不列《春秋》于学官"之意。王安石以其经学思想区分《春秋》经与传,视《春秋》经为"难知"但"可知",对《春秋》传则由"取"到"疑"以至"不足信"。针对《春秋》中天人关系、伦理等级等问题,王安石提出"任理而无情""以道进退"。王安石在北宋《春秋》学进程中间接为《春秋》学发展指明了新的致思方向,有一定的学术地位。In the academic history of Spring and Autumn Annals, it was a much discussed issue that Wang An-shi regarded the Spring and Autumn Annals as worthless record and abolished it from the imperial college. In fact, the former meant note books about Spring and Autumn Annals, the latter meant the development characteristics of classics. Wang An-shi distinguished between classics and commentaries. In other issues on the Spring and Autumn Annals, such as the relationship between Heaven and man and the ethical level, Wang An-shi had his opinion. So, Wang An-shi indirectly pointed the new thinking way to develop studying the Spring and Autumn Annals, and had a certain academic status.

关 键 词：王安石 《春秋》 “断烂朝报” “不列《春秋》于学官” 

分 类 号：K244[历史地理—历史学]