检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐翔宇[1] 刘玉杰[1] 李春宝[1] 齐玮[1] 曲峰[1] 李海峰[1] 袁邦拓[1] 申学振
机构地区:[1]解放军总医院骨科,100853
出 处:《中国矫形外科杂志》2017年第4期336-339,共4页Orthopedic Journal of China
摘 要:[目的]检验臀肌挛缩症功能量化评分表的信度和效度。[方法]2016年1月~2017年1月,对113例臀肌挛缩症患者应用臀肌挛缩症功能量化评分表进行功能评估,分为2次评估,时间间隔1周以上,所有患者同时填写简明健康状况调查表SF-36(SF-36 Health Survey)和Nottingham健康问卷NHP(Nottingham Health Profile)。利用Cranach'sα系数进行该量表的内部一致性信度检验,组内相关系数(intraclass correlation coefficient,ICC)评价重测信度,主成分分析法因子分析进行结构效度检验,Spearman相关系数评估效标效度。[结果]臀肌挛缩症功能量化评分表Cranach'sα系数为0.924,显示评分表内部一致性信度好。量表两次调查结果得分ICC值为0.905,显示评分表重测信度良好。因子分析结果显示评分表提取出的因子成分为4,表明设计合理,量表具有极高的结构效度。评分表与SF-36得分显著相关,Spearman相关系数为0.402(P<0.05);评分表和NHP显著相关,Spearman相关系数为-0.371(P<0.05),说明评分表得分越高,患者生活质量越好。[结论]臀肌挛缩症功能量化评分表具有良好的信度和效度,可用于臀肌挛缩症病情的评估。[Objective] To verify the reliability and validity of the gluteal muscle contracture disability scale (GDS) . [Method] A total of 113 patients with gluteal muscle contracture form January 2016 to January 2017 in our hospital were tested with the GDS, which was repeated more than 1 week later. All the patients were also measured through SF-36 Health Survey (SF-36) and Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) . The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, construct validity and criterion validity were evaluated by Cranach's α coefficient, Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), factor analysis and Spearman correlation coefficients, respectively. [Results] The Cranach's ct of GDS proved 0.924, showing a high level of internal consistency, additionally ICC of the total-scale was noted as 0.905, presenting a high level of test-retest reliability. Factor analysis indicated there were 4 components in the scale including daily activities, hip disability, sports activities and appearance. Significant correlation existed between this scale and the other two scales, SF-36 (r=0.402, P〈 0.05 ) and NHP (r=-0.371, P〈0.05 ) . [Conclusion] Gluteal muscle contracture disability scale showed excellent reliability and validity, which is an useful tool in evaluating the patients with gluteal muscle contracture.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222