检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:熊明[1]
机构地区:[1]华南师范大学政治与行政学院,广东广州510631
出 处:《湖南科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第1期25-30,共6页Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:克里普克在利用超赋值模式对真谓词进行构造时,使用了含糊谓词精确化的技术过程,但这种精确化一直缺少一个通过取舍点来分割语句的模型,这使得这种精确化在哲学上站不住脚。通过借助悖论度的概念,建立真谓词论域中的悖论语句这类特殊的边界情形中的偏序关系,从而给出了以悖论度作为取舍点来分割语句的精确化模型,为真谓词的超赋值构造提供了哲学上的辩护。A formulation of precisification for the vague predicate is taken in Kripke's supervaluational construction of the truth predicate. But the precisification for the truth predicate is philosophically untenable, since the partition of sentences is not based upon the choice of the cut - off points in the precisification. In this paper, the degrees of paradoxieality are used to provide a partial relation over the borderline cases of the truth predicate, that is, the paradoxical sentences, in the domain. And a model of precisification is established such that we divide sentences by taking the degrees of paradoxicality to be the cut - off points. We thus give a philosophical justification for the supervaluational construction of the truth predicate.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15