机构地区:[1]甘肃农业大学动物科学技术学院,兰州730070 [2]中国农业科学院北京畜牧兽医研究所,北京100193 [3]北京市畜牧总站,北京110102
出 处:《安徽农业大学学报》2017年第1期33-39,共7页Journal of Anhui Agricultural University
基 金:现代农业产业技术体系建设专项资金(CARS-42);中国农业科学院科技创新工程(ASTIP-IAS04)共同资助
摘 要:本试验以荧光灯作为对照,研究了不同光谱组合LED灯(A(21%蓝+30%绿+24%黄+25%红)、B(35%蓝+35%绿+18%黄+12%红)、C(27%蓝+30%绿+22%黄+21%红))对AA肉鸡的生长、屠宰性能和抗应激的影响。试验选取480只1日龄AA肉鸡,平均分配到4个光照处理组,每个处理4个重复,每个重复30只鸡(公母各半),自由采食和饮水。第1周光照强度为20 lx,从第2周开始至试验结束为5 lx,间歇光照节律(14L:4D:2L:4D)。结果表明,B光源组1~2周平均日增重分别比A、C和荧光灯组显著降低了15.05%、14.40%和20.47%(P<0.05);C光源组3~5周平均日增重分别比A光源和荧光灯组降低了8.62%和9.39%(P<0.05);且B光源组1~6周平均日增重与其他组相比有减小的趋势(P=0.06)。B光源组1~2周平均日采食量和料重比显著低于和高于其他3组(P<0.05)且1~6周的料重比与其他组相比有增大的趋势(P=0.09)。C光源组3~5周料重比显著高于B光源(P<0.05)。荧光灯组腹脂重和脂带宽显著低于B和C光源组(P<0.05);C光源组腿肌率显著高于A和B光源组(P<0.05);A光源组SOD值和荧光灯组T-AOC值显著提高(P<0.05)。C光源组H:L显著高于A和D光源组(P<0.05)。研究结果显示,A光源和荧光灯均有利于白羽肉鸡生产性能的发挥,同时提高抗氧化能力,缓解肉鸡的应激反应。从节能的角度考虑,肉鸡实际生产中可采用均衡型光谱组合LED灯更有利于生产效率的提高。The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of the different combination spectra of LED, A (21% Blue+30% Green+24% Yellow+25% Red), B (35% Blue +35% Green +18% Yellow +12% Red) and C (27% Blue+30% Green +22% Yellow +21% Red), on the growth, carcass performance and anti-stress ability of AA broilers. The fluorescent lamp was used as a control light source. A total of 480 day-old AA broilers were randomly assigned to four lighting treatments. Each treatment included 4 replicate groups with 30 chicks per group. Feed and water were provided for ad libitum. Light program was 20 lx for the first week, and 5 lx (14L: 4D: 2L: 4D) till the end (6 weeks of age). The results showed that broilers reared under B light source had significantly decreased aver- age daily gain by 15.05%, 14.40% and 20.47% of A, C and fluorescent lamp groups at 1 to 2 weeks, respectively (P〈0.05). C light source had significantly decreased average daily gain by 8.62% and 9.39% in A and fluorescent lamp groups at 3 to 5 weeks, respectively (P〈0.05). B light source had a tendency to decrease average daily gain of 1 to 6 weeks (P=0.06). B light source significantly decreased the average daily feed intake and increased feed gain ra- tio compared to other light groups at 1 to 2 weeks (P〈0.05), and B light source had a tendency to increase feed gain ratio of 1 to 6 weeks (P=0.09). C light source significantly increased feed gain ratio compared to B groups at 3 to 5 weeks (P〈0.05). Abdominal fat weight and fat strip width in fluorescent lamp group were significantly lower than those in B and C groups (P〈0.05). C light source significantly increased thigh muscle percentage compared to A and B groups (P〈0.05). Moreover, the antioxidant carcass SOD under A light source and T-AOC under fluorescent lamp were greater than those for the other light groups (P〈0.05). A significantly increase of H:L was observed in birds reared under C light source group
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...