本土视角与他证史料:任乃强记叙红军长征过藏区的文本考察  

Local Perspective and "Other Edident" Material:A Historical Study of A Text from Ren Naiqiang's Narrative on the Red Army's Long March in Tibetan Areas of Sichuan

作　　者：石硕[1] 王丽娜[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学中国藏学研究所

出　　处：《民族研究》2016年第5期18-26,共9页Ethno-National Studies

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目"大型藏区地方史<康藏史>编纂与研究"(项目编号:10&ZD110)的阶段性研究成果;四川大学学科前沿与交叉创新研究项目资助

摘　　要：目前对于红军长征过藏区史实的构建,主要依凭来自红军方面的种种记述与回忆,多为一种"自证"的史料。如何挖掘"他证"史料以印证、弥补和充实红军方面的记述与回忆,对于红军过藏区的史料建设有着特别重要的意义。本文以康藏研究学者任乃强于1936-1941年间形成的一个记叙红军过川西藏区的文本为线索,通过同其他相关史料的对照与参证,考察分析了红军长征过藏区的相关史实。文章发现,任乃强这一记叙红军过藏区的文本不但秉承了学者的客观、中立立场,且基于藏族民众的调查并有着当地视角,真实记述了红军过藏区的情况,对红军长征过藏区的历史研究是一条珍贵的"他证"史料。At present,the construction of the history of the Red Army's Long March mainly depends on various accounts and memories from the side of the Red Army,mostly as a kind of' self-evident' materials.Searching 'other-evident'materials to prove,make up and enrich the Red Army's accounts and memories is significant for the collection of the historical materials about the Red Army's Long March in Tibetan areas of Sichuan.This paper analyzes the historical facts about the Red Army's Long March in the Tibetan areas of Sichuan through the comparison other related historical materials with a text written by Ren Naiqiang,a scholar of Kham studies,during 1936-1941.The paper discovers that Ren's account of the Red Army's Long March is not only objective and neutral,but also based on the investigation about the Tibetans with local perspectives.It is a valuable' other evident'material on the historical studies of the Red Army's Long March in Tibetan areas.

关 键 词：任乃强 红军长征 川西藏区 藏族 

分 类 号：D231[政治法律—政治学]