检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李昊[1]
机构地区:[1]北京航空航天大学人文与社会科学高等研究院/法学院,北京100191
出 处:《苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第1期73-82,共10页Journal of Soochow University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"侵权责任法实施中的疑难问题研究"(项目编号:12BFX083)的阶段性成果
摘 要:在英美法上,旅游经营者的义务可以通过委托履行(替代履行)转由第三人承担,但旅游经营者仍要对受托人的履行行为承担责任。在一揽子旅游中,就旅游服务提供者给旅游消费者造成人身财产损害的情形,英国法经历了从判例确立的过错责任到立法规定的严格的替代责任的发展趋势,旅游经营者现在需要对旅游服务提供者的致害行为承担严格责任,但也享有有限的抗辩;而在美国法上,除了公共包机旅游经营者外,旅游经营者仍主要承担传统的过错责任,其对第三方服务提供者的过失原则上不承担责任,并享有较为宽泛的抗辩。In Anglo-American law, the obligations of a travel operator could be transferred to a third party by means of vicarious performance or delegation, yet the travel operator is still responsible for the performance of the third party. In the package travel, when the body or property of a consumer is injured by the defective performance of services provider, the UK law has evolved gradually from the fault-based liability to strict vicarious liability, and now the travel operator will be strictly responsible for the defective performance of the services provider only with limited defenses. In contrast, in American law, except the public charter tour operator, the travel operator's liability is still mainly fault-based, and could raise broader defenses.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117