检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张翔[1]
出 处:《绥化学院学报》2017年第3期46-49,共4页Journal of Suihua University
摘 要:正当防卫作为刑法赋予公民保护自身与他人合法权益的武器,在制止和预防犯罪方面有着良好的社会效果,但是对完全无刑事责任能力人能否进行正当防卫一直是学界讨论的问题。虽然附带限制的承认成为了通说,但通过对完全无刑事责任能力人侵害行为侵害性和违法性的分析发现,由于我国刑事违法性概念内涵的缺失以及"四要件"犯罪构成理论与违法性判断的不耦合性,使得我国在认定完全无刑事责任能力人的侵害行为是否为不法侵害上出现了困难。从社会危害性与违反法律规范的角度去认定完全无刑事责任能力人的不法侵害则可以为实现该问题的应然立场提供解决方案。Justifiable defense, as a weapon for citizens endowed by criminal law to protect the lawful rights and interests of their own and others, works well on stopping and preventing crime. But the problem that if act adopted to prevent the injurious act conducted by person completely without criminal capacity shall be regarded as self-defense or not is always the object discussed by academia. It has been widely acknowledged that it constitutes a justifiable defense according to admission with restrictions. However, we can see, through the analysis on infringement and illegality of injurious act by person completely without criminal capacity, that it is difficult in China to affirm the injurious act by person completely without criminal capacity is unlawful infringement and hard to ensure the necessary function of justifiable defense in criminal law due to deficiency of concept and connotation of criminal illegality, and uncoupling between "four elements" theory of crime constitution and illegality judgment. This way is to affirm the unlawful infiingement from the perspective of social harm and violation of legal rules, which provides solutions for constituting the should-be position of this problem.
关 键 词:正当防卫 完全无刑事责任能力人 不法侵害 刑事违法性
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.98