谈台湾部分文章对丘逢甲抗日的误读及厘清  

Misinterpretationin Some Taiwan Papers on Qiu Fengjia's Fighting against Japan and Their Clarifications

作　　者：张正田 翁汀辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]龙岩学院,福建龙岩364000

出　　处：《龙岩学院学报》2017年第1期26-30,共5页Journal of Longyan University

摘　　要：历史解释首重尊重史料史实,不能桎梏于自己主观认定某种史观后又曲解、误读史料以削足适履。自台湾方面有人提出"以岛范史"论后,台湾岛内"台湾历史论述"也被部分人"以论带史"甚至"以论曲史",让史实被某种程度刻意"误解"与"制造"。台湾某些文章关于丘逢甲抗日的历史解释,其文作者对相关史料刻意曲解与误读,违背了"考证求真"的历史学研究方法。The most important part of historical interpretation is its respect on the historical facts,which cannot be chained to one＇s own recognition of some sort of view on history. The historical data cannot be distorted or misinterpreted to fit this view. From the aspect of Taiwan,after some people’s proposal of “ Describing Taiwan history within Taiwan Island,” the “ discussion of Taiwan history” in Taiwan has also been “ discussed in a subjective perspective” and even been “ discussed in an intentionally distorted perspective” by some people,causing a certain degree of “misunderstanding” and “fabrication.” As for the historical explanation on Qiu Fengjia’s fighting against Japanese in some papers of Taiwan,the distortion and misinterpretation of related historical data by the authors of these papers so as to construct a “Historical Construction Theory” for it to conform to one’s own historical view.

关 键 词：台湾抗日 甲午战争 乙未抗日 历史误读 “以岛范史” 丘逢甲 

分 类 号：K256.4[历史地理—历史学]