小儿哮喘经氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗的效果对比  

Effect observation of oxygen driver atomization and compressor pump atomization in the treatment of pediatric asthma

作　　者：王辉[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西省紫阳县人民医院儿科,陕西安康725300

出　　处：《临床医学研究与实践》2017年第4期93-94,共2页Clinical Research and Practice

摘　　要：目的探讨在小儿哮喘治疗中,采用氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入的临床效果。方法选取2012年3月至2015年3月我院收治的150例哮喘患儿,将患儿分为观察组与对照组,每组75例。对照组患儿采用空气压缩泵雾化吸入,观察组患儿采用氧驱动雾化吸入,比较两组患儿的临床效果。结果观察组患儿的总有效率为96.0%,明显高于对照组患儿的70.7%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗后,两组患儿血氧饱和度明显优于治疗前,且观察组患儿的血氧饱和度优于对照组,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在小儿哮喘治疗中,采用氧驱动雾化吸入后,能够缓解患儿的临床症状,改善缺氧状态,并提高血氧饱和度,值得临床推广应用。Objective To investigate the clinical of oxygen driver atomization and compressor pump atomization in the treatment of pediatric asthma. Methods One hundred and fifty cases of children with pediatric asthma from March 2013 to March 2015 admitted in our hospital were selected, and were divided into observation group and control group, with 75 cases in each group. The control group accepted compressor pump atomization, while the observation group received oxygen driver atomization. The clinical effects of two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was 96.0%, which was higher than 70.7% of the control group （P〈0.05）. After treatment, the oxygen saturations of two groups were better than those before treatment, and the oxygen saturation of the observation group was better than that of the control group, the differences were statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Oxygen driver atomization in the treatment of pediatric asthma can relieve the clinical symptoms, improve the hypoxia and oxygen saturations. It worthy of clinical application and popularization.

关 键 词：小儿哮喘 氧驱动雾化吸入 空气压缩泵雾化吸入 

分 类 号：R725.6[医药卫生—儿科]