检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]浙江工商大学金融学院,讲师博士杭州310018 [2]中共浙江省委政策研究室改革研究和促进中心,杭州310025
出 处:《浙江社会科学》2017年第2期40-49,共10页Zhejiang Social Sciences
基 金:浙江省哲学社会科学规划课题项目(11JCYJ02YB);国家自然科学青年基金项目(71403040)的阶段性成果
摘 要:渐进式的财政省直管县改革在取消地市级财政参与县级税收收入分成的同时,不仅将地市级财政与县级财政的税收竞争关系从"父子竞争"关系转变成了"兄弟竞争"关系,也造成了省直管县地区和市管县地区财政地位的不平等。本文结合全国1628个县级行政区2000-2009年的空间面板计量模型检验了省直管县改革中财政层级变化对县级政府非对称税收竞争行为的影响。结果表明:(1)县级横向税收竞争在2005年前属于"打到底线"的竞争,而在2006年后属于"力争上游"的横向竞争关系;(2)省直管县改革具有加强横向税收策略互补关系的倾向,省直管县地区对相邻地区的策略反应强于市管县地区。Since the 2000 s, China has pushed forward the province-managing-county reform in some provinces as an experiment of flat public management. Changing from the previous 'city jurisdiction over counties' model in which counties are placed under the jurisdiction of prefecture-level cities and are placed cities under the jurisdiction of province, the reform adopts a new system in which provincial governments directly manage county governments on fiscal matters, and thus give reformed counties more fiscal autonomy.To identify the asymmetrical effects of local fiscal system reform on the tax strategic interaction, we use a rich Chinese database, which provides information on all kinds of taxes collected by 1628 counties or cities during the period 2000~2009. The results of two-regime spatial panel data models show that(1) decentralization of taxation to lower-level governments can give rise to a 'race to the bottom' in tax rates setting before2005 and a 'race to the top' in tax rates setting after 2006;(2) Both counties in 'city jurisdiction over counties' regime have stronger strategic complementarity behavior in tax rate setting than counties in 'provincial administration of counties' regime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.217.26