检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郝倩倩[1]
机构地区:[1]天津医科大学第二医院门诊,天津市300211
出 处:《世界华人消化杂志》2017年第3期267-270,共4页World Chinese Journal of Digestology
摘 要:目的观察综合护理联合常规护理在胃癌患者运送途中突发事件的预防效果.方法取2015-12/2016-08医院收治胃癌患者80例,随机分为对照组(n=40)和观察组(n=40).对照组运送途中给予常规护理,观察组运送途中联合综合护理,比较2组护理效果.结果观察组护理后运送途中突发事件发生率低于对照组(7.50%vs 20.00%,?2=6.014,P<0.05);2组护理前焦虑、抑郁评分差异无统计学意义(t=1.294,0.593,P>0.05);观察组护理后焦虑、抑郁评分低于对照组(34.12±2.03 vs 43.24±2.31,36.01±1.99 vs 40.93±2.03,t=22.192,19.293,P<0.05);观察组护理满意率高于对照组(97.50%vs 87.50%,?2=5.396,P<0.05).结论胃癌患者运送途中在常规护理基础上联合综合护理效果理想,能降低突发事件发生率,值得推广应用.AIM To observe the effect of comprehensive care combined with routine nursing care in preventing emergency events during the transportation of patients with gastric cancer.METHODS From December 2015 to August 2016,80 patients with gastric cancer were randomly divided into a control group(n = 40) and an observation group(n = 40).In the control group,routine nursing was given during the transportation,and comprehensive nursing care was given in the observation group.The nursing effects of the two groups were compared.RESULTS The incidence of emergency events in the observation group was significantly lower than that in the control group(7.50%us20.00%,χ^2 = 6.014,P〈0.05).There was no significant difference in anxiety or depression scores between the two groups either before(t= 1.294,0.593,P〉0.05) or after nursing(34.12± 2.03 us 43.24±2.31,36.01±1.99 us 40.93±2.03,t = 22.192,19.293,P〈0.05).The nursing satisfaction rate of the observation group was higher than that of the control group(97.50%us 87.50%,χ^2 = 5.396,P〈0.05).CONCLUSION Comprehensive nursing care combined with conventional nursing care can reduce the incidence of emergency events during transportation of patients with gastric carcinoma.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.190.40