井-含水层系统地下水类型定量分析和判别  

Quantitative analysis and discrimination of groundwater type in well-aquifer system

作　　者：丁风和[1] 范雪芳[2] 戴勇[1] 王鑫[1] 

机构地区：[1]内蒙古自治区地震局,中国呼和浩特010010 [2]山西省地震局,中国太原030021

出　　处：《地震学报》2017年第1期78-84,共7页Acta Seismologica Sinica

基　　金：2016年度震情跟踪合同制定向重点工作任务(2016020305)资助

摘　　要：利用水位、气压和理论固体潮数据,采用卷积回归法中水位对气压的阶跃响应函数,定量地分析和判定了华北北部板桥井、大灰厂井、黄骅井、大甸子井、丰镇井和三号地井的井-含水层系统的地下水类型,并结合研究时段内各井的气压系数和M2波潮汐因子的结果进行了对比分析.结果表明:1各井的滞后时间与阶跃响应函数之间存在明显的以e为底的指数函数关系,且底数e的系数的正负决定了井-含水层系统的地下水类型;2承压井的阶跃响应函数随滞后时间的增大而增大,且最佳阶跃响应函数值越大,相应的气压系数和M2波潮汐因子也越大,反之亦然;3潜水井和半承压水井的阶跃响应函数随滞后时间的增大而减小,其最佳阶跃响应函数与气压系数和M2波潮汐因子间的关系不明显,可能与含水层的水力特性、井孔结构及固体潮汐波的频率有关.In this study, we quantitatively analyzed and determined groundwater types of well-aquifer system for the wells Banqiao, Dahuichang, Huanghua, Dadianzi, Fengzhen and Sanhaodi by using water level, barometric pressure and theoretical earth tide. Furthermore, combining with step response function of water level to barometric pressure in convolutional regression, barometric coefficient and tidal factor of Me wave are comparatively analyzed for each well in the studied period. The results show that. ① an obvious exponential relationship exists between lag time and step response function with ＂e＂ as the bottom, and the sign symbol of the coefficient before the base ＂e＂ could determine groundwater types of well-aquifer system; ② step response function is growing with lag time increase for artesian wells, and the larger the optimal step response function value is, the larger barometric coefficient and tidal factor of M2 wave are, and the reverse is also true; ③ step response function decreases with latency increase for phreatic and half artesian wells, and because of hydraulic characteristics of aquifer, borehole structures and frequency of solid tidal waves, the relationship between the optimal step response function and barometric coefficient, tidal factor of M2 wave is inconspicuous.

关 键 词：井水位 井-含水层系统 定量分析 气压系数 潮汐因子 

分 类 号：P315.723[天文地球—地震学]