检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连医科大学重症医学研究所/大连医科大学附属第一医院重症医学科,辽宁大连116011
出 处:《医学与哲学(B)》2017年第1期22-24,共3页Medicine & Philosophy(B)
摘 要:自1991年脓毒症首次被提出以来,脓毒症的定义和诊断标准不断更新和完善,今年已经是"第三版"(Sepsis 3.0),每次更新都融入许多新的理论或观点,但同时也充满了争议,在这种争议和讨论中脓毒症的定义和诊断标准趋于更加完善。它代表了我们对感染引起的患者全身炎症反应以及后续器官功能障碍等病理生理机制或状态认识水平的不断提高,是与当前医疗现状密不可分的。本文就脓毒症的整个发展历程和相关争论进行详述,期望大家从理论上更好地理解脓毒症的内涵。The definition and diagnosis criteria of Sepsis constantly updated and improved since 1991 when it was proposed in the first time,and now is "the third edition"(Sepsis 3.0).Many new theories or opinions had been proposed,but also full of controversy.Through those dispute and discuss,the definition and diagnosis of sepsis is improving.It represents our enhanced level of the understanding to the pathophysiological mechanisms of systemic inflammatory response syndrome and subsequent organ dysfunction in patients with infection,and is matched correspondingly with the current medical conditions.I narrate the all development and debate of sepsis for detail in the paper,and expect the connotation of sepsis will be understood deeply.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28