检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘鹏[1]
出 处:《福建体育科技》2017年第1期16-18,共3页Fujian Sports Science and Technology
摘 要:运用文献资料法、逻辑分析法等对现代社会中的"碰瓷"现象与竞技体育赛场上的假摔现象进行对比研究。研究发现:两种现象在行为、目的、影响方面存在相似性,体育竞赛中针对假摔的处罚更为具体、针对性强,而"碰瓷"现象的裁罚存在一定的缺陷。因此,从体育竞赛规则裁判法的角度对"碰瓷"现象的裁罚提出合理化建议,从而对完善我国的法律建设提供一定帮助。Using the literature material law, the contrast analytic method of " pengci" phenomenon in modern so- ciety and sports arena flopping phenomenon research, the study found that the two phenomena in behavior, pur- pose, effect exists similarity and can be compared, by comparing the sports competition in needle of diving punish- ment is more reasonable, specific, targeted, and " pengci" phenomenon of cutting penalty has obvious defects. So from the point of view of sports rules of a contest judge law cut on the phenomenon of " pengci" penalty put forward rationalization proposals, and thus provide some help to perfect the legal construction of our country.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7