徘徊在“从一重”与“从一重重”间的想象竞合犯  

The Imaginative Joinder of Offenses Wandering between “Single Punishment on The Basis of The Most Serious Crime” and “Heavier Sentencing on The Basis of The Most Serious Crime”

作　　者：陈伟[1] 石莹[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《山东警察学院学报》2017年第1期5-15,共11页Journal of Shandong Police College

基　　金：中央财政支持地方高校建设项目"特殊群体权利保障与犯罪预防研究"的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：想象竞合作为支撑现代罪数理论大厦的坚固根基,回溯其设立的初衷,对现有学说逐一剖析,并在取舍间进行理性抉择,"形式数罪,实质一罪"因合乎常理常情仍占据无可比拟的地位。"从一重处断"是我国刑法规制想象竞合犯的基本立场,但是随着罪刑均衡原则的提倡,其已陷入困境,摆脱这一困境,在对想象竞合犯量刑时应采用"从一重重处断"原则。这是该原则合理价值的彰显,亦是我国想象竞合犯规制原则的革新之路。As a solid basis of modern theory of crime quantity,imaginative joinder is used to make a rational choice between acceptance and rejection after looking back the original intention of its establishment and analyzing the present theory one by one. ＂Plural crime is just the form,single crime is the essence＂is playing an incomparable role for the common sense. ＂Single punishment on the basis of the most serious crime＂is the basic standpoint of the imaginative joinder of our criminal law,but with the promotion of principle of balance between crime and penalty,some complicated contradictions have emerged. Slighter crime has also its floor,so its principal penalty and supplementary punishment should also be included,which is consistent with the principle of exhaustion and prohibition of repeatable evaluation. ＂Heavier sentencing on the basis of the most serious crime＂is also the reforming path of imaginative joinder of offenses for its reasonable value.

关 键 词：想象竞合 存在本质 诉讼考量 规制原则 

分 类 号：D914[政治法律—刑法学]