农地制度改革中的“湄潭实验”:四个焦点问题——与刘守英研究员商榷  

"MEITAN EXPERIMENT" IN THE REFORM OF RURAL LAND SYSTEM:FOUR KEY ISSUES——A discussion with Liu Shouying

作　　者：田孟[1] TIAN Meng(China Rural Governance Research Center, Huazhong University of Science ＆ Technology, Wuhan 430074, Chin)

机构地区：[1]华中科技大学中国乡村治理研究中心,湖北武汉430074

出　　处：《河南工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2017年第2期1-9,共9页Journal of Henan University of Technology:Social Science Edition

基　　金：2015年国家社科基金青年项目:阶层分化背景下农村社会治理研究(15CKS022)

摘　　要：以"增人不增地、减人不减地"为核心内容的"湄潭实验"对我国农地制度产生了深远影响。近30年来,湄潭实验一直备受争议,其中农民对土地调整的真实想法、土地与农民收入的关系、农民家庭生命周期的影响以及湄潭实验的作用等,是争议的焦点问题。通过实地调研并利用理想模型方法分析发现,农民普遍具有较强的调地意愿,土地为农民提供了更优化的收入保障,农民家庭生命周期对农民的收入具有决定性影响,湄潭实验在提高农民农业生产积极性、控制农村人口、克服土地细碎化以及促进城镇化等方面的作用十分有限。湄潭实验既不公平、也无效率,必须进行深刻反思,以完善我国农村基本经营制度。＂Meitan Experiment＂ has a profound impact on China~ rural land system in that its core content is that the increase in rural population does not necessarily involve the increase in land supply while the decrease in population does not involve the decrease in land supply. ＂Meitan Experiment＂ has always been controversial over the past 30 years in which farmers＂ real idea about land adjustment, the relationship between land and farmers＂ income , and the role of Meitan Experiment are the focuses of controversy. Field investigation and the use of ideal model analysis show that farmers generally have a strong willingness for land adjustment and that the land provides a more optimal security for farmers＇income while farmers＇family life cycle has a decisive in- fluence on the difference in farmers＇income. Meitan Experiment has limited function in improving farmers＇ en- thusiasm for agricultural production, ring urbanization. Meitan experiment controlling rural population, overcoming land fragmentation and promois neither fair nor efficient, and thus it is necessary to carry out a profound reflection in order to improve China~ basic rural management system.

关 键 词：湄潭实验 农地调整意愿 农民收入 家庭生命周期 理想模型方法 

分 类 号：C912.82[经济管理]