帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪司法适用问题研究——以客观归责方法论为视角  

The Judicial Application Research on Offences of Helping Information Network Criminal Activities by Using Methodology of Objective Imputation——From the Perspective of Objective Responsibility-attribution

作　　者：李冠煜[1] 吕明利[1] Li Guanyu Lv Mingli(Law School of Central China Normal University, Wuhan Hubei 43007)

机构地区：[1]华中师范大学法学院,湖北武汉430079

出　　处：《河南财经政法大学学报》2017年第2期65-72,共8页Journal of Henan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目"网络共犯行为刑法规制的边界与路径研究"之阶段性成果(项目编号:CCNU16A06011)

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(九)》第二十九条增设的帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪在司法适用中存在诸多争议,应当适当借鉴客观归责方法论,并妥善运用有关刑法解释方法来解决。该条将部分的帮助行为正犯化,但根据罪责刑相适应原则,在特定情形下,可以按照重罪的帮助犯论处。帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪只能以作为的方式实施,必须以法益侵害作为其归责根据,通过限制解释和实质解释,避免对有关网络服务商科以过重的义务。为了认定帮助故意中的"明知",需要采取不同的证据规则,在某些不得不进行推定的场合,需要通过判断行为人能否实际履行结果回避义务,来推定其是否明知。Article 29 th of Criminal Law Amendment（ 9） had added offences of helping Information network criminal activities,but there are many disputes in the judicial application.The methodology of objective imputation should be an appropriate reference,and the judges can properly use the interpretation methods of criminal law to solve this problem.This provision means that part of aiding acts are regarded as principle offender,however,in a particular situation,some criminals can be punished as the aiding act of the heavier crime according to the principle of suiting punishing to crime and criminal responsibility. The offences of helping Information network criminal activities can only be committed actively and be blamed based on violating legal interests.In the process,it＇s necessary to interpret strictly and substantially in order to avoid to bear too heavy obligations on Internet service providers. In order to assume awareness of aiding intention,different rules of evidence should be adopted.In some cases,the judges must use judicatory presumption to estimate whether actors can actually implement duties to avoid harmful results.

关 键 词：客观归责方法论 帮助信息网络犯罪活动罪 帮助犯正犯化 法益侵害 结果回避义务 

分 类 号：D924.36[政治法律—刑法学]