检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国人民大学新闻学院,北京100872 [2]中国人民大学新闻与社会发展研究中心,北京100872
出 处:《山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第2期72-77,共6页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
摘 要:文章从社会公共利益的角度,对媒介报道与司法公开公正及其对社会的影响进行了分析。作者借鉴国外相关规则"雷诺兹特权",阐述了公共利益抗辩原则适用于司法的路径及其原理;并就司法知情权的制度保障提出了建议。在媒体与司法的关系上,媒体对公开审判案件的事实的报道权利源于公众知情权;对司法审判结果的讨论批评权源于宪法。媒介与司法基于社会共同利益目标实现而建立起良性关系,是社会进步的根本条件之一。From the perspective of social public interests, this paper justice and their influences on society as well. Inspired by the regula analyzes media reports, judicial openness and tion of "Reynolds Privilege", the authors elaborate the idea that the demurrer principle of public interests can be applied to the 1 egislative method and theory, and they also put forward some suggestions on system guarantee for the judicial right - to - know. In terms of the relationship between media and jurisdiction, the fight of media to report the case on trial originates from the right - to - know of the public and the right to discuss and criticize originates from the Constitution. That the media and jurisdiction bridges the positive relationship for the realization of social common interests is one of the fundamental conditions for social advancement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222