检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,杨凌712100
出 处:《农业经济问题》2017年第2期32-40,共9页Issues in Agricultural Economy
基 金:国家社会科学基金重大项目"生态文明建设背景下自然资源治理体系构建:全价值与多中心途径"(编号:15ZDA052);国家自然科学基金项目"西北地区水资源配置的多目标协同研究:全价值评估与公众支持"(编号:71373209)
摘 要:耕地资源非市场价值评估既是福利经济学研究的热点,又是资源管理政策制定的依据。本文以张掖市甘州区的耕地保护规划为契机,基于选择实验详述了非市场价值评估中指标选取过程和实验设计方法,使用Mixed Logit模型和经验仿真方法分析了城镇居民和农村居民消费者剩余的变动。结果表明,耕地保护政策实施后,甘州区城镇居民的平均补偿剩余为3445.79元/户,农村居民的平均补偿剩余为3263.19元/户,社会福利整体增加5.09亿元;城镇和农村居民组内对价值评估指标的偏好存在显著的随机性,组间对耕地生态系统服务的支付意愿存在显著的异质性。Welfare Economics has generated an abundance of non-market valuation methods to help inform farmland protection policies. Choice experiment,based on public preference,is often employed for such valuation for understanding the benefits associated with different policy outcomes. Drawing from a case study of farmland conservation program in Zhangye Ganzhou district,this paper elaborates the formation of choice attributes and experimental design through the development of choice experiment questionnaire. Mixed logit model together with empirical simulation is used to measure urban and rural residents' welfare change separately. We conclude that: 1) the average urban residents in Ganzhou district are willing to pay 3445. 79 Yuan per household,compared with rural residents' 3263. 19 Yuan for the implementation of farmland conservation policy,and the average total welfare improvement will be 590 million Yuan; 2) urban and rural residents' preference for choice attributes varies within groups,and their estimated willingness to pay shows significant heterogeneous across groups.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3