检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈吉祥[1] 郎锦义[2] 胡静[3] 张新 黎杰[2] 杨敬贤[1] 吴昊[1] 朱广迎[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学肿瘤医院放疗科恶性肿瘤发病机制及转化研究教育部重点实验室,北京100142 [2]四川省肿瘤医院放疗科,成都610041 [3]新疆石河子大学医学院第一附属医院放疗科,石河子832008 [4]北京市医疗器械检验所,北京101111
出 处:《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》2017年第3期251-254,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
摘 要:目的 调查基层医院加速器使用情况,探索国产加速器的优势与不足.方法 选择使用国产加速器和进口加速器的基层医院各26家,成组t检验差异.结果 (1)26家进口设备平均治疗2808人/d,26家国产设备平均治疗3923人/d(P=045).(2)设备品牌、治疗人数及开展的治疗技术和医院级别无明显关系.(3)被调查单位需引进放疗医生、物理师和技师的比例分别为878%、776%、878%.(4)国产和进口品牌在采购成本、维护成本之间差异显著(P=000、004),在产品服务、适用性、易用性以及设备稳定性方面均相近(P=0.21-100、0.15-052、0.07-100).(5)国产设备在小剂量重复性方面较差,在设备故障远程诊断方面尚是空白.结论 国产加速器基本能满足基层医院目前需求且综合成本低于进口加速器,大多数调查和测试指标和进口加速器相当,但国产加速器在小剂量重复性、远程诊断和计划系统方面有较大提升空间.Objective To investigate the application of accelerators in primary hospitals, and to explore the advantages and disadvantages of domestic accelerators. Methods Twenty-six primary hospitals that used domestic accelerators and an equal number of primary hospitals that used imported accelerators were enrolled in the study. Comparison was made by group t test. Results ( 1) The mean numbers of patients treated every day were 2808 for the 26 hospitals with imported accelerators and 3923 for the 26 hospitals with domestic accelerators ( P=045 ) . ( 2 ) There was no significant relationship of hospital level with equipment brand, the number of treated patients, or treatment technology.(3) The proportions of hospitals that need to employ radiotherapy doctors, physical therapists, and technicians were 878%, 776%, and 878%, respectively.(4) The purchasing and maintenance costs were significantly higher for the imported accelerators than for the domestic ones ( P=000, 004);there were no significant differences in product service, applicability, convenience, or stability between imported and domestic accelerators ( P= 021-100,015-052,007-100).(5) For the domestic accelerators, the repeatability was poor in the low-dose treatment, and the remote diagnosis of equipment failure was not yet achieved. Conclusions Domestic accelerators can meet the basic requirements of primary hospitals. Compared with imported ones, domestic accelerators have lower total costs but comparable indices in most investigations and tests. In terms of repeatability of the low-dose treatment, remote diagnosis, and planning system, however, domestic accelerators still have a long way to go.
分 类 号:R197.39[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.246.41