检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]北京大学城市与环境学院,北京100871 [2]北京大学城市规划与设计学院,广东深圳518055 [3]北京师范大学地理学与遥感科学学院,北京100875
出 处:《地理科学》2017年第2期181-189,共9页Scientia Geographica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(41401170)资助~~
摘 要:目的地竞争模型是空间相互作用领域的重要进展之一,但其有效性尚未得到一致认可,且缺乏基于中国的实证依据。基于中国2010年城市间铁路客流数据,采用目的地竞争模型进行实证分析,并与传统空间相互作用模型相比较,以检验目的地竞争模型在实际应用中的有效性。结果表明:1空间结构对中国城市间铁路客流存在显著影响,目的地之间存在较强的竞争效应;2目的地竞争模型的引入显著地减弱了距离衰减参数的空间自相关程度,较大程度上改善了传统空间相互作用模型的距离衰减参数标定偏误问题;3既有研究中在区域尺度下对传统空间相互作用模型(即重力模型)参数的标定及实证分析可能会存在偏误,目的地竞争模型这一改进模型具备应用价值。Spatial interaction model is an important research field. Existing studies indicate spatial structure of destinations has a significant impact on spatial flow. Thus, traditional spatial interaction models suffer model misspecification problem because the absence of spatial structure variable. Among the modified models intro- duced to solve the misspecification problem, the competing destinations model is the most widely-used one. The competing destinations modelassumes that the travelers' destinations selecting process adopts a hierarchi- cal information processing strategy.Based on this strategy, the spatial decision process is divided into two stag- es. In the first stage, travelers select a destinations cluster containing a set of destinations; in the second stage, travelers select an individual destination from the cluster selected in the first stage. The competing destinations model has been empirically applied in numerous studies in foreign countries.However, the empirical conclu- sions with respect to the validity of the competing destinations model are still far from agreement. Moreover, none empirical study of this model has been conductedin China. This study applies the competing destinations model based on intercity railway passenger data in 2010 in China, and test its validity by comparing it with tra- ditional spatial interaction models. The estimations of the competing destinations model as well as the tradition- al spatial interaction model are conducted by the maximum likelihood method, which is calculated by a new method distinguishing from existing studies, i.e. the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) algorithm. The con- clusions can be drawn as follows. 1) Spatial structure has a significant impact on intereity railway passenger flow of China, and there exists a significant competing effect among destinations both in the system-wide esti- mation results and in the origin-specific estimation results. The system-wide distance-decay parameter estimat- ed in the competing destinations model �
关 键 词:空间相互作用模型 重力模型 目的地竞争模型 空间结构 距离衰减参数
分 类 号:K902[历史地理—人文地理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15