涉犯罪合同效力问题研究  

Study of the Validity of Crime-involved Contract

作　　者：姚辉[1] 王林清[2] Yao Hui Wang Linqing

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学法学院,北京100872 [2]最高人民法院,北京100745

出　　处：《法学杂志》2017年第3期11-20,共10页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目"民法学方法论研究"(项目批准号为:08JJD820180)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：民刑交叉案件应当区分两个部门法的价值及效力的不同予以处理。在涉犯罪合同效力的判断上,应当避免以刑法的判断代替民法的判断、以刑法的犯罪事实代替民法合同效力构成而进行简单推论。即使以《合同法》第52条第5项的规定作为依据,也须从民法、刑法各自的规范及法理出发,以影响民事合同效力的不同因素及类型为依据,在不同的情形下分别确定涉犯罪合同的效力。Crossed case of civil law and criminal law shall be dealt differently according to the value and validity of the two department laws. When judging the validity of crime - involved contract, we shall avoid making judgment on the basis of criminal law without concerning civil law, and avoid making corollary on the basis of the criminal facts of penal law without concerning the contract effectiveness constitution of civil law. Even in the light of the fifth term, 52 article of the Contract Law, the validity of crime - involved contract must be determined respectively in different circumstances according to regulations and legal principles of both civil law and criminal law, and based on various contributing factors and types that affect the validity of civil contract.

关 键 词：民刑交叉 涉犯罪合同 合同效力 

分 类 号：D923.6[政治法律—民商法学]