不杀止于杀——死刑司法控制中的公众舆论引导研究  

No Kill Ended from Kill——Research on Public Opinion Guidance of the Judicial Control of Death Penalty

作　　者：王勇[1] Wang Yong

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《法学杂志》2017年第3期69-78,共10页Law Science Magazine

基　　金：吉林大学科学前沿与交叉学科创新项目"公众舆论与死刑的司法控制研究"(2016QY022);吉林大学法学院犯罪治理研究中心资助项目;国家社会科学重点项目"依法治国与以德治国的关系研究"(项目编号:14AZD135)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：死刑的司法控制不能完全迎合公众舆论或者等待公众舆论的自我变革,而是要在充分尊重和理解公众舆论的基础上适当地引导公众舆论。当前,死刑司法控制中的公众舆论引导方式产生了"不杀激发杀"的负面效果,这种情况源于以下三种原因:宽、严失调;轻实质标准,重酌定情节;常识与专业知识的冲突。因此要转变为"不杀止于杀"的理性策略,即摒弃过去的那种对抗性思维,转换为共识性思维,在理解公众舆论"杀"的诉求基础之上,通过"杀"所确立的死刑立即执行的刚性标准,来说服公众舆论接受和认可"不杀"的事实与理念,最终形成"不杀止于杀"的良性循环。为了实现这一策略,一要探索暴力犯罪的死刑司法限制适用标准;二要统一刑事政策对"杀"与"不杀"的裁判尺度;三要完善指导性案例的选择与说理。从而逐步实现死刑适用标准的公众认同,在司法上真正限制并减少死刑的适用。The judicial control of death penalty can＇ t fully meet the public opinion or wait it＇ s self - change, but on the basis of respecting and understanding public opinion to guide it ap- propriatly. Current public opinion guidance in the judicial control of death penalty has produced the negative effect of ＂not kill leading to kill＂. The reasons are as follows： the first is there is disorder in relaxation between harshness, the second is we emphasize not the substantive stand- ards but the disrectionary sentencing circumstances, the third is the conflict between common sense and professional knowledge. So we should change to the rational strategy of ＂no kill ended from kill＂： the first is to explore the applicable standard of the death penalty for the violent crime, the second is to unify the judgment standard of the criminal policy in ＂kill＂ and ＂no kill＂, the third is to improve the selection and reasoning of guiding cases. With the above actions, we can realize the public recognition in the applicable standards of death penalty gradually, and to limit and reduce the application of the death penalty in judicial practice really.

关 键 词：死刑 司法控制 公众舆论 不杀止于杀 

分 类 号：D924.12[政治法律—刑法学]