《山谷年谱》诸版本述略——兼论四库修书的得失  

Analysis on the Versions of Valley Chronicle——The Incidental Discussion on the Gains and Losses in the Compiling of Siku

作　　者：琚小飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学清史研究所

出　　处：《图书馆工作与研究》2017年第3期82-87,共6页Library Work and Study

摘　　要：由于留存于世的黄庭坚年谱版本较多,且至今没有系统的整理本,因此今人利用黄谱多有不便。本文通过对黄庭坚年谱初撰时的卷数及其演变的梳理,以及对流传的全帙本的校勘,认为四库荟要本《山谷年谱》是所有版本中最为精善的。同时,在比对四库诸本《山谷年谱》的异同后,初步认为至少在《山谷年谱》的校勘上,四库修书存在诸多重复工作,因而影响了四库本在版刻流传中的地位。Because of the more retained versions of Huang Tingjian chronicle, and there is still no systematic .so far, it is inconvenient to use Valley Chronicle. Based on the combing of the volume number and the evolution of the early time of engrabing the Huang Tingjian chronicle and the collating of the convection of the whole chapters, this paper points out that the sikuhuiuyao version of Valley Chronicle is the best one in the whole versions. At the .same time, in the comparison of the similarities and differences of Siku versions of Valley Chronicle, this paper puts forward that there were a lot of repetitive works in compiling Siku which affected the positon of Siku version in engraving circulation.

关 键 词：黄庭坚 《山谷年谱》 四库修书 

分 类 号：G256[文化科学—图书馆学]