检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴伟[1]
机构地区:[1]对外经济贸易大学公共管理学院
出 处:《中国行政管理》2017年第3期73-77,共5页Chinese Public Administration
基 金:国家社科基金项目"我国行业协会制度的组织特征和能力建设研究"(编号:10BGL103)
摘 要:本文探讨了行业协会的竞争逻辑及其相关效率问题,发现就会员逻辑而言,单纯的协会竞争并不能提高协会的服务能力及水平,而是取决于协会所处行业的市场结构。同时,协会竞争合理性与会员规模相关,只有当协会随着会员规模增大出现规模不经济时,才需引入适度竞争。对于影响逻辑,竞争对协会代表性和游说能力产生绝对负向作用。竞争使协会出现碎片化,虽然集体行动能力可能增强,但同时导致协会会员密度下降,反而不利于协会游说能力,协会代表性此时也被削弱,最终不利于协会影响力。最后,提出应针对协会不同存在逻辑对其进行分类改革,调整政会关系,建立适宜竞争体制,以提高协会服务能力与影响能力。This paper studies the competitive logic of business association and relevant efficiency,which shows competition alone can't enhance ability of business association but depends on the industrial structure. Rationality of competition is much closed to membership size. Competition is needed only when the provision of service has diseconomy of scale. Competition exerts a negative effect on capacity of lobbying and representation. Competition brings the fragmentation of business association and may boost the chance of collective action whereas lowers the membership density which is positively correlated to ability of lobbying and representation and ultimately dampen the capability of influence. Finally, business association should be categorized in terms of its two logic of existence, relationship between government and business association should be readjusted, and proper rival institution should be constructed to enhance the capability of service and the influence of business association.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.113