检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西北工业大学机电学院,陕西西安710072 [2]长安大学工程机械学院,陕西西安710064
出 处:《机械设计》2017年第2期105-109,共5页Journal of Machine Design
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51105310);高等学校学科创新引智计划资助项目(B13044);陕西省自然科学基金资助项目(2016JQ5107)
摘 要:为对飞机驾驶舱人机界面进行科学评价,针对传统层次分析法存在的的不一致性问题,基于群组决策特征根法和模糊理论提出AHP-GEM模糊综合分析法。基于AHP方法建立了驾驶舱人机界面评价指标体系;运用AHP-GEM模糊综合评价方法将定性指标转换为定量指标,进而构建了飞机驾驶舱人机界面评价模型与软件原型系统。以某型飞机驾驶舱人机界面设计评价为例,验证了该方法有助于规避决策过程的主观性,简化了传统计算过程。In order to make a scientific evaluation for human-machine interface in the aircraft cockpit, the AHP-GEM fuzzy comprehensive analysis method has been proposed in this paper based on Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) combined with Group Eigenvalue Method (GEM) from fuzzy theory and group decision feature root method. The evaluation index system of aircraft cockpit human-machine interface was establishe.d based on the AHP method. The qualitative indicators were converted into quanti- tative indicators through the AHP-GEM fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. The human-machine interface evaluation model in the aircraft cockpit and the software prototype system were construced. A human-machine interface design in the aircraft cockpit was taken as the example to verify that this method was helpful to avoid the subjectivity of the decision-making process and simpli- fy the traditional calculation process.
关 键 词:人机工效 飞机驾驶舱人机界面 AHP-GEM 模糊评价
分 类 号:R857.13[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68