检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙岩[1] 沈均康[2] 郝跃峰[3] 秦卫[3] 徐吉雄 胡丹[3] 刘可夫[1]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属苏州医院放射科,江苏苏州215008 [2]苏州大学附属第二医院放射科,江苏苏州215004 [3]南京医科大学附属苏州医院骨科,江苏苏州215008 [4]无锡人民医院放射科,江苏无锡214023
出 处:《中国医学影像技术》2017年第3期454-457,共4页Chinese Journal of Medical Imaging Technology
基 金:苏州市临床重点病种诊疗技术专项项目(LCZX201310)
摘 要:目的比较靴形线圈的质子密度加权成像(2D-FSE-PD)、三维可变翻转角快速自旋回波序列(3D-SPACE)成像和小FOV表面线圈2D-FSE-PD序列成像对距骨软骨损伤成像的准确率。方法对43例患者(45个踝关节)采用靴形线圈行2D-FSE-PD和3D-SPACE序列扫描,然后更换为小FOV表面线圈行2D-FSE-PD成像。以关节镜检查结果为金标准,比较3种扫描方法显示距骨软骨损伤的符合率。结果小FOV表面线圈2D-FSE-PD序列的符合率为86.67%(39/45),靴形线圈2D-FSE-PD序列的符合率为60.00%(27/45),靴形线圈3D-SPACE序列的符合率为68.89%(31/45)。小FOV表面线圈2D-FSE-PD序列的符合率高于靴形线圈3D-SPACE序列(χ~2=4.114,P=0.002)和2D-FSE-PD序列(χ~2=8.182,P<0.001),而靴形线圈3D-SPACE序列的符合率与2D-FSE-PD序列的差异无统计学意义(χ~2=0.776,P=0.125)。结论与靴形线圈的2D-FSE-PD与3D-SPACE序列相比,小FOV表面线圈2D-FSE-PD成像能更好地显示距骨软骨损伤。Objective To compare the accuracy rate of talar osteochondral lesions between the small field of view(FOV)surface coil MR imaging and 2D FSE proton density weighted imaging(2D-FSE-PD),3D-SPACE sequences MR imaging with boot-shaped coil.Methods Totally 43 patients(45 ankles)underwent 3D-SPACE sequence after 2D-FSE-PD sequence scanning using the boot-shaped coil,then the PDWI sequence was scanning after the boot-shaped coil was replaced by the small FOV surface coil at 1.5T MRI.The results of the arthroscopic examinations was regarded as the standard for assessing the accuracy rate of the three methods.Results The accuracy rate of 2D-FSE-PD sequence with small FOV surface coil was 86.67%(39/45),the accuracy rate of 2D-FSE-PD sequence with boot coil was 60.00%(27/45),the accuracy rate of 3D-SPACE sequence with boot coil was 68.89%(31/45).The accuracy rate of small FOV surface coil was higher than those of boot coil used 3D-SPACE sequence(χ~2=4.114,P=0.002)and boot coil used 2D-FSE-PD sequence(χ2=8.182,P〈0.001).There was not significant difference between 3D-SPACE sequence using boot coil and 2D-FSE-PD sequence using boot coil(χ2=0.776,P=0.125).Conclusion Compared with the 2D-FSE-PD and 3D-SPACE sequences with boot-shaped coil,the small surface coil scanning with routine sequence can show talar osteochondral lesions better.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R681.3[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28