检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵颖[1] 赵珩[1] Peter Ho Zhao Ying Zhao Heng Peter Ho(College of Life and Environmental Sciences, Minzu University of China, Beijing 100081, China)
机构地区:[1]中央民族大学生命与环境科学学院,北京100081
出 处:《草业科学》2017年第3期635-643,共9页Pratacultural Science
基 金:国家自然科学基金“基于土地制度变迁视角的中小城镇发展模式研究”(71473286)
摘 要:本文以产权为视角,在总结中国民主革命前至今的草原制度变迁的基础上,探讨了目前产权是否明晰的关注点多集中在制度形式而非制度功能,并进一步分析草原承包制施行中存在的不足。虽然草原承包制明晰产权在初期可提高经济效率、改善牧民生活水平,然而忽视功能推行草原承包制则会引发草原管理问题。本文从制度功能的独特视角探讨产权明晰,分析中国草原管理中存在的局限性,以期为草原管理政策提供帮助。The current academic debate on natural resources management focuses on whether property rights need clarity.All studies thus far have focused on the institutional form rather than on institutional function.However,Institutional function theory holds that the clarity of property rights is only an institutional form,institutional form is not important,it is a subsidiary of institutional function,the decisive role of the function rather than the form.Although the grassland contracting system can improve economic efficiency and improve standard of living herdsmen at an early stage,this system could likely cause problems and limitations in grassland management.This study discusses property rights from the perspective of institutional functions,and analyses the limitations of grassland management in China,with a view to help improve grassland management policies.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.227