《子虚》《上林》赋的分篇及其学术意义  

The Separation of Zixu Fu and Shanglin Fu and Its Academic Significance

作　　者：踪凡[1] Zong Fan

机构地区：[1]首都师范大学文学院

出　　处：《中州学刊》2017年第2期139-145,共7页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目"历代赋学文献考"(10BZW061)

摘　　要：梁昭明太子萧统在编纂《文选》时,将《史记》《汉书》所载之《天子游猎赋》分为《子虚》《上林》两篇,后人多从之。自宋人王观国以来,不少学者认为《子虚》《上林》实为一篇赋,不宜加以割裂,所论不无道理。但从本质上讲,《子虚》《上林》赋的分篇是一种值得关注的文化现象,它不仅使赋题与内容的对应更为准确,而且有效地遏制了《天子游猎赋》在先唐时期异名繁多、指称混乱的局面,同时也在一定程度上反映了中国古代的文学创作与学术研究从混沌走向精确、从含糊走向明晰的历史进程。《子虚》《上林》之名行用已久,自然不宜进行更改或抛弃。Most people agree that the Collected Essays compiled by Xiao Tong in Liang Dynasty divided the Emperor Hunting Fu which was recorded in the Record of History and the History of Han Dynasty into two distinct texts： Zixu Fu and Shanglin Fu. This view changed until Song Dynasty when a scholar Wang Guanguo viewed that Zixu Fu and Shanglin Fu should be known as a whole instead of being driven apart, and a lot of scholars followed his opinion as a reasonable version. Thus in essence, it＇s a sort of cultural phenome- non worth mentioning, which enhanced the accuracy of connections between titles and contents and efficiently prevented a chaos of the title variations in Emperor Hunting Fu during the Former Tang Dynasty. It also reflected the development of Chinese classical literature creation and academic researches from being blurry to accuracy to some extent. It had been a long time for Zixu Fu and Shanglin Fu to be used as titles, obviously, changing or abandoning them is not right.

关 键 词：《子虚赋》 《上林赋》 分篇 意义 

分 类 号：I207[文学—中国文学]