检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]河北民族师范学院,承德067000
出 处:《包装工程》2017年第6期134-137,共4页Packaging Engineering
摘 要:目的辨析"反设计"这一设计学术语被滥用的种种情形,强调其正确的意义。方法通过分析历史上的反设计运动、反设计意识,以及这一术语被不恰当使用的种种情形,对"反设计"的意义进行对比和辩证地研究。结论反设计是20世纪六七十年代意大利的激进设计运动,以及由此衍生开来的与主流权威背道而驰的叛逆性设计意识形态。"反设计"这一术语的使用应遵循单义性原则,设计学理论研究中新概念的构建不应再占用这一术语的表述。It aims to discriminate of the term "Anti-Design" in the field of design with it's correct meaning. Comparative and dialectical researches on the meaning of "Anti-Design" are performed through the analysis of Anti-Design Movement in history, anti-design ideology and a variety of situations in which the term is used improperly. Anti-Design is a radical design movement in Italy in the 1960s to the 1970s and the resulting treasonous design ideology which is contrary to mainstream and authority. The usage of the term "Anti-Design" must follow the principle of monosemy, and any introduction of new concepts in design theory research should not occupy the representation of the term "Anti-Design".
分 类 号:TB472[一般工业技术—工业设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222