检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马放[1] 梁雄伟[1] 王立[1] 李哲[1] 姜晓峰 汪根 张雪[1] Vitus Tankpa MaFang Liang Xiongwei Wang Li Li Zhe Jiang Xiaofeng Wang Gen Zhang Xue Virus Tankpa(State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China Beijing Oriental Landscape Design Co., Ltd., Beijing 100012, China)
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室,黑龙江哈尔滨150090 [2]北京东方利禾景观设计有限公司,北京100012
出 处:《环境保护科学》2017年第1期59-65,共7页Environmental Protection Science
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2016YFC0401105);国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2013ZX07201-007);国家自然科学基金(51179041)项目资助
摘 要:为在寒冷地区建立高效的滨岸缓冲带水体工程,选择早熟禾、高羊茅、3种本地耐寒性植物,研究剪股颖构建河流滨岸缓冲带植物的经济性、生长特性、光合作用及其对悬浮物、氮、磷的净化能力。结果表明,3种植物在经济性方面高羊茅与早熟禾差别不大,远低于剪股颖;在生长特性方面,早熟禾与高羊茅的表现相近,高羊茅略好,但比剪股颖表现优秀,早熟禾在净光合作用速率、蒸腾速率以及水分利用效率方面比高羊茅及剪股颖出色;在面源污染物去除率方面,地表径流悬浮物的去除中,早熟禾表现突出;在溶解性磷与总氮的净化中,3种植物表现差异不大,早熟禾略有优势。综合比较各项指标,早熟禾可作为寒冷地区构建滨岸缓冲带较为理想的备选植物。In order to establish an efficient riparian buffer zone in cold regions, 3 local cold resistant plant species, namely, Poa pratensis L, Festuca arundinacea and Agrostis stolonifera, are selected for study of the costs, growth characteristics, photosynthesis ability and purification ability for suspended solid particles, total nitrogen(TN) and soluble phosphorus of the plants used for construction of riparian buffer zone. The results show that the cost of Festuca arundinacea and Poa pratensis L is far lower than that of Agrostis stolonifera. The growth rate of Festuca arundinacea and Poa pratensis L is better than that of Agrostis stolonifera, and Festuca arundinacea is slightly better than Poa pratensis L. Moreover, Poa pratensis L performs better than Festuca arundinacea and Agrostis stolonifera from the aspects of net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate and water use efficiency. With regard to none-point source pollutant removal, Poa pratensis L does well in suspended solids removal. There is no much difference between the three plants in removal of TN and soluble phosphorus, but Poa pratensis L has slight advantages. Comprehensive comparison of various indicators among these plants shows that Poa pratensis L is more ideal alternative plant for riparian buffer zone in cold regions.
分 类 号:X522[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.16.50.172