检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱庆强[1] 朱文荣[1] 叶靖[1] 田彤彤[1] 尚松安[1] 王军[1] 彭铮堃 陈翔[1] 陈文新[1] 吴晶涛[1]
机构地区:[1]江苏省苏北人民医院医学影像科扬州大学l临床医学院,扬州225001
出 处:《中华放射学杂志》2017年第3期188-191,共4页Chinese Journal of Radiology
基 金:国家自然科学基金(81401384);江苏省卫计委面上项目(H201551);江苏省“六大人才高峰”资助项目(WSW-079)
摘 要:目的 探讨扩散峰度成像(DKI)评价肾透明细胞癌恶性程度的价值.方法 回顾性分析经手术病理证实且术前行肾脏DKI检查的67例肾透明细胞癌患者的影像资料.患者行肾脏DWI和DKI检查.对手术病理标本进行Fuhrman病理分级,其中Ⅰ级16例、Ⅱ级17例、Ⅲ级15例、Ⅳ级19例,再分为低级别组(Ⅰ级+Ⅱ级)和高级别组(Ⅲ级+Ⅳ级).测量肿瘤ADC值和DKI成像参数,包括平均扩散系数(MD)、各向异性分数(FA)、平均峰度(MK)、径向峰度(RK)以及轴向峰度(KA).采用单因素方差分析比较不同病理分级患者间MRI参数的差异,采用Pearson相关分析评价MRI参数和病理分级的相关性.结果 肾透明细胞癌不同病理分级患者的ADC、MD、MK、KA和RK值差异有统计学意义(P均〈0.05),FA值差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05).ADC、MD值与病理分级呈负相关,r值分别为-0.732、-0.799,P均〈0.05;MK、KA及RK值与病理分级呈正相关,r值分别为0.699、0.773、0.768,P均〈0.05.MD、MK、KA及RK值鉴别低、高级肾透明细胞癌的ROC下面积分别为0.923、0.926、0.892和0.833.结论 DKI成像有助于术前评价肾透明细胞癌的病理分级.Objective To investigate the value of diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) in assessing grades of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CRCC). Methods Sixty seven patients with pathologically proven CRCC, who underwent MRI scan preoperatively, were analyzed retrospectively and were divided into four groups according to their pathological grading of cancer, including 16 withⅠgrade, 17 withⅡgrade, 15 withⅢgrade and 19 withⅣgrade. These tumors were then divided into low (Ⅰ+Ⅱ, 33 cases) and high grade (Ⅲ+Ⅳ, 34 cases) groups. ADC, mean diffusivity (MD), fractional anisotropy (FA), mean kurtosis (MK), kurtosis anisotropy (KA) and radial kurtosis (RK) were obtained. Parameters of DWI (ADC, MD, FA, MK, KA and RK) were measured. One-way ANOVA analysis of variance and Pearson correlation were used. Results ADC values of the four groups were (0.87±0.18) ×10^-3, (0.76±0.12) ×10^-3, (0.63±0.16) ×10^-3, (0.43±0.08) ×10^-3mm^2/s (P〈0.05). MD values were 2.68±0.23, 1.94±0.25, 1.72±0.37, 0.67±0.22 (P〈0.05). FA values were 0.17 ± 0.03, 0.13 ± 0.04, 0.17 ± 0.06, 0.15 ± 0.05 (P〉0.05). MK values were 0.42 ± 0.03, 0.55 ± 0.06, 0.58 ± 0.14, 1.19 ± 0.11 (P〈0.05). KA values were 0.44 ± 0.05, 0.60 ± 0.07, 0.61 ± 0.10, 1.53 ± 0.23 (P〈0.05). RK values were 0.37±0.08, 0.49±0.09, 0.56±0.16, 0.99±0.19 (P〈0.05).Both ADC and MD correlated negatively with tumor grading (r=-0.732 and -0.799, P〈0.05). MK, KA and RK values correlated positively with tumor grading (r=0.699, 0.773, 0.768, P〈0.05). Areas of MD, MK, KA and RK values under ROC curves to diagnose low and high grade cancers were 0.923, 0.926, 0.892 and 0.833. Conclusion DKI model of multi-b value DWI may provide useful information in the grading of CRCCs preoperatively.
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R737.11[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.30