检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:汪凤兰 张丽娜[2] 张盼 孙淑丰 董胜莲 张小丽 邢凤梅 刘晓雯 郭晓文
机构地区:[1]华北理工大学护理与康复学院,河北唐山063000 [2]河北科技大学图书馆,河北石家庄050018
出 处:《现代预防医学》2017年第6期1044-1046,1050,共4页Modern Preventive Medicine
基 金:河北省社会科学基金项目(HB15SH021)
摘 要:目的调查不同ADL老人的养老意愿以及对养老服务的需求。方法采用统一的问卷,包括一般人口学资料、日常生活活动能力量表、养老意愿和需求调查表等,对724名60岁以上的老年人进行面对面的调查。结果老年人ADL正常组415例(占57.3%),功能下降组120例(占16.6%)、功能障碍组189例(占26.1%)。不同程度ADL老年人对养老方式的选择不同,差异有统计学意义(χ2=43.347,P<0.01)。不同程度ADL老年人对养老服务项目的需求不同,差异有统计学意义(χ2=33.052,P<0.01)。结论不同程度ADL老年人对养老服务需求项目不同,建议社区工作者应根据老年人的ADL状况,为其提供切合需要的养老服务。Objective To investigate the intention for old-age support and the requirements for elderly care service among elderlies in different ADL (Activities of Daily Living) groups. Methods Totally 724 elderly people who were over 60 years old were investigated with the demographic data, ADL scale and a questionnaire about the intention for old-age support and the requirements for elderly care service. Results There are 415 cases (accounting for 57.3%) in normal ADL group, 120 cases (accounting for 16.6%) in decreased function group and 189 cases (accounting for 26.1%) in dysfunction group. The choice of the way of elderly care varied in the degree of ADL(x^2=43.347 ,P〈0.01), so did the requirements for elderly care service ADL (x^2=33.052,P〈0.01). Conclusion The requirements for elderly care service were different in different ADL groups. It is proposed to allocate the resources according to the needs of old people in different ADL.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166