移动护理信息系统掌上电脑表面消毒方法及消毒间隔时间的研究  

Analysis of disinfection method and intervals for nursing personal digital assistant

作　　者：任赛[1] 张雅琴[1] Ren Sai Zhang Yaqin(General Surgical Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China)

机构地区：[1]北京协和医院基本外科二病房,100730

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2016年第35期5126-5128,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的探讨移动护理信息系统掌上电脑（PDA）表面消毒方法及消毒间隔时间。方法2016年10月选取北京协和医院外科病房112台PDA，采用随机数字表法将其随机分为试验组和对照组各56台，分别采用75%乙醇溶液、卡瓦布进行表面消毒，比较消毒前后及不同时间间隔取样的菌落培养合格率。结果试验组菌落培养合格率为91.07%，对照组为92.86%，两组差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。两组不同消毒时间间隔纵向比较结果显示，试验组消毒间隔时间7d，对照组消毒间隔时间8d，可保证PDA表面消毒效果。结论75%乙醇溶液、卡瓦布对PDA的消毒效果均可达标且消毒效果相近，但卡瓦布成本较高，乙醇消毒步骤较复杂，临床科室可根据自身情况选择其中一种消毒方法。Objective To explore the best disinfection method and intervals for personal digital assistant （PDA）. Methods A total of 112 PDAs in general surgical department were randomly divided into experimental group and control group, 56 respectively. PDAs were disinfected using 75% ethanol and eavi wipes respectively in two groups. Colony culture qualified rates before and after disinfection and different intervals were compared between two groups. Results Colony train qualified rate in experimental group was 91.07%, while in control group was 92.86%. There was no significant difference in disinfection and sterilization between two groups （P〉0.05）. Disinfection intervals were 7 days in experimental group and 8 days in control group. Both groups had effective sterilization on PDAs. Conclusions 75% ethanol and cavi wipes have similar effects in PDA＇s disinfection. Cavi wipes is more expensive, while the disinfection procedure of alcohol is more complex. The department could choose either based on its own condition.

关 键 词：消毒 掌上电脑 乙醇 卡瓦布 消毒间隔 

分 类 号：R472.1[医药卫生—护理学]