检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中国社会科学院法学系 [2]北京知识产权法院
出 处:《知识产权》2017年第3期60-68,共9页Intellectual Property
摘 要:案例指导制度是最高人民法院在当前司法改革中构建的一项具有中国特色的司法制度。以知识产权审判为视角,指出案例指导制度在我国司法实践中尚未有效落地,指导性案例在数量、范围、援引情况、援引方式等方面还存在不足。各方面观念尚未达成共识、缺乏外部配套机制、裁判说理不足、缺乏专业技术平台、制度设计本身存在缺陷等均影响到案例指导制度的有效实施。目前要争取在更大范围内尽快形成共识,并以知识产权审判作为突破口进行先行先试,从外部配套机制和内在制度设计两方面入手,推动我国案例指导制度不断发展和完善。Case guidance system is a judicial system with Chinese characteristics,which is promoted by the Supreme People’s Court in the process of judicial reform.From the perspective of intellectual property trial,it is pointed out that the case guidance system has not yet been effectively landed in the judicial practice in China,and there are still some deficiencies in respect of the number,scope andciting of guiding cases.As the ineffective implementation of the case guidance system mainly due to the lack of consensus,external support mechanism,judgment reasoning,professional technical platform,and the defects in the system design,we should struggle to reach consensus in a wider range,and wisely choose intellectual property trials as a breakthrough to promote the continuous development and improvement of China’s case guidance system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3