欧委会执行法院判决重启反倾销调查的违法性分析  

The Illegality of Restarting the Anti-dumping Investigation by the European Commission

作　　者：张桂红[1] 李彦彦[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《南都学坛（南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报）》2017年第2期69-76,共8页Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University

摘　　要：随着中国企业的法律意识和应对水平的提高,将欧盟的反倾销措施诉至欧洲法院并取得胜诉的案件越来越多。但是,欧委会在实践中执行法院判决的做法却存在规避之嫌,欧委会普遍通过重启调查重新征税的方式抵销了中国企业的胜诉成果。为此,应从法理、判例、规则等角度分析欧委会重启反倾销调查的违法性。具体应包括:没有正确履行欧盟条约的规定;违背了欧盟法一般法律原则;缺少欧盟反倾销基本法的依据。此外,由于欧委会的做法可能与WTO协议不尽相同。具体应做到:力争税收返还的权利;充分行使新调查中的抗辩权;司法审查路径再探;司法诉讼与WTO争端解决机制并用。Because of the rise of China’s enterprises’legal consciousness and its responsive level, the law cases of suing EU＇s anti-dumping measures in European court and with winning ends are more and more. But the European Commission deals with the recovering of China＇s enterprises by generally restarting the investigation and reimposing a tax. So it is very necessary to analyze the illegality of the European Commission＇s anti-dumping investigation from the angles of the legal theory, judicial prece-dent and rule.

关 键 词：反倾销诉讼 重启调查 违法性 应对措施 

分 类 号：D996.1[政治法律—经济法学]