检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘广宇[1]
机构地区:[1]黑龙江中医药大学附属第二医院骨二科,黑龙江哈尔滨150001
出 处:《中外医疗》2017年第4期41-43,共3页China & Foreign Medical Treatment
摘 要:目的分析治疗神经根性颈椎病时采用闭合性松解术的临床效果。方法方便选取2015年10月—2016年10月该院收治的神经根性颈椎病的患者80例,分为对照组和治疗组,其中对照组35例,其余45例为治疗组。对治疗组患者采用闭合松解术进行治疗,对照组患者进行常规的牵引推拿治疗。治疗周期均为3个疗程,进行为期3个月的随访,观察两组患者治疗前后的症状、体征变化和临床疗效,并进行比较分析。结果对照组和治疗组患者在接受治疗后体现的症状和体征积分差异有统计意义(P<0.05),治疗组在改善神经根性颈椎病方面优于对照组。治疗组和对照组的总体疗效进行比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论闭合松解术对于治疗神经根性颈椎病具有非常确切的疗效。Objective To analyze the clinical effect of Close lysis in treatment of cervical nerve root. Methods Convenient selection 80 cases of patients from October 2015 to October 2016 with cervical nerve root were divided into two groups, the control group(35 cases) were treated with routine traction-massage, while the treatment group(45 cases) were treated with close lysis, and the treatment cycle was three courses, and the symptoms, sign change and clinical curative effect before and after treatment of the two groups were compared and analyzed after three-month follow-up. Results The differences in the symptoms and sign integral after treatment between the two groups had statistical significance(P〈0.05), and the improvement of cervical nerve root in the treatment group was better than that in the control group, and the difference in the total curative effect between the two groups had statistical significance(P〈0.05). Conclusion The curative effect of close lysis in treatment of cervical nerve root is definite.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222