机构地区:[1]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院麻醉中心,100029 [2]首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院心脏外科,100029 [3]北京市心肺血管疾病研究所
出 处:《中国医药》2017年第4期521-525,共5页China Medicine
基 金:国家卫生和计划生育委员会公益性行业科研专项项目(201402009);北京市卫生和计划生育委员会科研专项(首发2011-2006-03)
摘 要:目的探讨乌司他丁早期干预对Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层围术期炎性细胞因子水平的影响。方法选择2013年5月至2015年5月于首都医科大学附属北京安贞医院住院确诊的Stanford A型急性主动脉夹层患者88例。根据住院时间段将患者分为对照组(50例,2013年5月至2014年5月入院)和观察组(38例,2014年6月至2015年5月入院)。对照组术前按常规处理;观察组将1 000 000 IU乌司他丁溶入250 ml 0.9%氯化钠溶液中,术前6~8 h缓慢静脉滴注。2组患者均检测麻醉诱导后(T1)、离室前(T2)、术后6 h(T3)及术后24 h(T4)血浆炎性因子水平,包括肿瘤坏死因子α(TNF-α)、白细胞介素6(IL-6)和IL-10。记录比较2组患者重症监护病房(ICU)机械通气时间、ICU停留时间、住院时间、术后呼吸系统并发症和病死率情况。结果组内比较,2组TNF-α水平在T2时明显高于T1时[对照组:76(12,323)μg/L比60(13,206)μg/L;观察组:57(18,87)μg/L比52(12,96)μg/L],T3、T4时[对照组:54(15,245)μg/L、59(16,219)μg/L;观察组:40(15,87)μg/L、34(12,73)μg/L]明显低于T2时,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);对照组TNF-α水平在T4时明显高于T3时,而观察组TNF-α水平在T4时明显低于T3时,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);对照组IL-6水平在T2时明显高于T1时[57(13,106)μg/L比52(16,108)μg/L],T3、T4时[48(23,94)μg/L、48(10,91)μg/L]明显低于T2时,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05),观察组IL-6水平在T2、T3、T4时低于T1时[53(17,125)、48(26,64)、45(8,67)μg/L比79(38,128)μg/L],T3、T4时明显低于T2时,T4时明显低于T3时,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05)。组间比较,观察组TNF-α水平在T3、T4时明显低于对照组,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.05);观察组IL-6水平�ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of early intervention with ulinastatin on inflammatory cytokines in patients with Stanford A acute aortic dissection during perioperative period. MethodsTotally 88 patients with Stanford A acute aortic dissection from May 2013 to May 2015 in Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University were divided into control group(50 cases) and observation group(38 cases) according to admission orders. The control group had routine treatment before operation. The observation group had intravenous infusion with 1 000 000 IU ulinastatin in 250 ml 0.9% sodium chloride solution 6-8 h before operation. Plasma inflammatory factors including tumor necrosis factor α(TNF-α), serum interleukin 6(IL-6) and IL-10 were detected after anesthesia induction(T1), at the end of operation(T2), 6 h(T3) and 24 h(T4) after operation. Duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit(ICU) stay, length of hospital stay, postoperative respiratory complications and mortality were analyzed. ResultsThe level of TNF-α at T2 was significantly higher than that at T1 in both groups[control group: 76(12, 323) μg/L vs 60(13, 206) μg/L; observation group: 57(18, 87) μg/L vs 52(12, 96) μg/L];levels of TNF-α at T3, T4[control group: 54(15, 245)μg/L, 59(16, 219)μg/L; observation group: 40(15, 87)μg/L, 34(12, 73)μg/L] were significantly lower than the level of TNF-α at T2(all P〈0.05). The level of TNF-α in control group at T4 was significantly higher than that at T3; the level of TNF-α in observation group at T4 was significantly lower than that at T3(both P〈0.05). The level of IL-6 in control group at T2 was significantly higher than that at T1[57(13, 106)μg/L vs 52(16, 108)μg/L]; levels of IL-6 at T3, T4[48(23, 94)μg/L, 48(10, 91)μg/L] were significantly lower than the level of IL-6 at T2(all P〈0.05). Levels of IL-6 in observation group at T2, T3, T4 were significantly lower than t
分 类 号:R543.1[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...